REGELKRAVEU PPWR Art. 7 - 30% rPET in contact-sensitive packaging by 2030 · CA AB 793 - 25% PCR in bottles by 2025 · CA SB 54 - 65% by 2032Alla regelverk →
NEXAMINSIGHTSINTE KOPPLAT TILL NEXAM CHEMICAL AB
NEXAM2.70 SEK ≈ $0.27
MKT CAP 305 MSEK ≈ $31MSHARES 102,662,09252W 2.18 - 4.08 SEK ≈ $0.22 - 0.41NASDAQ FIRST NORTH

Library · Recycling · GUIDE

Mechanical vs. Chemical Recycling

Updated Read 3 minEN · SV · +19

What each process does to the polymer, why only one of them creates a market for reactive additives, and which European rules are still unwritten.

Mechanical recycling melts plastic and reshapes it. Chemical recycling takes it apart into smaller molecules and builds new polymer from them. The difference matters commercially because the two have different costs, different limits, and, in European law, different regulatory status. It matters to a Nexam Chemical shareholder because reactive additives sell into one of them and not the other.

The short version

Mechanical recyclingChemical recycling
What happens to the polymerMelted and reformed, chains stay as they are, shorter each passBroken down to monomers or feedstock, then repolymerized
Typical inputSorted, relatively clean single-polymer streamsMixed, colored or contaminated streams that mechanical lines reject
Output qualityDepends on input and on how many lives the material has hadIn principle equal to virgin, since the polymer is rebuilt
Energy and costLowerHigher
Where additives helpYes: restoring processability of the degraded polymerNo: the polymer is remade from scratch

Why mechanical recycling degrades material

Every melt cycle shortens polymer chains. Shear breaks them, heat and oxygen break them, and moisture breaks the ones in polyesters. Contamination from other polymers and from labels and adhesives widens the distribution and seeds defects. The visible consequences depend on the process, but in most of them what fails first is melt strength rather than any number on a specification sheet. That is the whole premise of the reactive additive business: the material is chemically fine, and rheologically not.

Why chemical recycling is not simply better

It costs more energy and more money, and its capacity is small next to mechanical recycling. In European law it also sits in an unfinished regulatory frame, which is worth understanding before treating announcements about it as volume.

  • For food contact, Regulation (EU) 2022/1616 requires recycled plastic to be made with a suitable technology listed in its Annex I, or with a novel technology developed under its Chapter IV, with authorisation of the individual recycling process where relevant.
  • For the packaging mandate, Regulation (EU) 2025/40 leaves the decisive details to acts that are still being written. Article 7(8) requires an implementing act on how recycled content is calculated and verified, and Article 7(9) a delegated act setting sustainability criteria for plastic recycling technologies, both due by 31 December 2026. The Commission lists them as still in preparation.

Until those are adopted, how much of a chemically recycled batch counts toward a target, and under what accounting, is not settled. Any model that converts announced chemical recycling capacity into compliant recycled content is making an assumption the law has not yet made.

Which one is the market for additives

Mechanical. A reactive chain extender works by re-coupling the chain ends that mechanical recycling leaves behind. If a polymer has been depolymerized and rebuilt, there is nothing to repair, and the output competes with virgin resin on its own terms.

This is the frame for reading any announcement in this sector. Growth in chemical recycling capacity is not growth in Nexam Chemical's addressable market. Growth in the recycled content that has to come from mechanical streams is exactly that, and the 2030 minimums are what create it.

Supply, in official numbers

The EU generated 79.7 million tonnes of packaging waste in 2023, of which 15.8 million tonnes was plastic. Plastic packaging recycling has a 55% target for 2030; in 2023 only Belgium at 59.5% and Latvia at 59.2% were above it, and several member states were below 30%. Essentially all of that recycling is mechanical.

Sources

Independent research, not affiliated with Nexam Chemical and not investment advice.